I.
Origin of Term[1]
"Smeaton
states, 'Theophilus of Antioch about 175 A.D., speaks
of a Triad in the Godhead.' To Tertullian (160-220) we are indebted for the
first use of the word Trinity to describe the Godhead." [2]
II. The Trinity in the Old Testament
A.
Plural references to God
1. The name Elohim employs a plural ending (cf. seraphim, cherubim).[3]
2. “Us.” Gen. ; Gen.
3.
The shema - use of the compound one (echad).
"The
famous shema (Deu. ), the most fundamental saying about God for a Jew,
declares, 'Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our Elohim is one Jehovah.' Far from
declaring that the God of the Bible is a singular being, the Hebrew word
translated 'one' is echad, which means a unity of several becoming one, as when
God said the man and woman became 'one [echad] flesh' (Gen. ); when many
soldiers became 'one [echad] troop' (2S. ) or when two sticks became 'one
[echad] stick' (Eze. )." [4]
B.
The Father and Son
1. Conversation between the Father and Son. Ps.
2. The LORD speaks to David’s Lord. Ps.
3. A riddle concerning the Son. Pr.
4. Triune cry of the Seraphim (and living creatures). Isa. )
5. A Son to be born, but named Mighty God, and Everlasting Father. Isa.
6. The Son of Man and the Ancient of Days. Dan.
C.
The Father, Son, and Spirit
1. The Father and the Spirit send the Son. Isa.
2. The Father, the Angel of His presence (face, countenance), and the Holy Spirit. Isa.
III. The Trinity in the New Testament
A.
Father, Son, and Spirit.
1. Baptism of Jesus. Matt.
2. Trinitarian formula. Mtt.
3. The annunciation. Luke
4. The promised Helper. John
5. Three that bear witness. 1 John [5]
B.
Father and Son
1. Mystery of God includes both Father and Son, Col.
IV. Actions by the Trinity
A. The atonement of Christ. Isa.
B. Creation. Gen. ; Job
C. The incarnation. Luke ; Php.
D. The resurrection.[6] John ; Rom.
E. Regeneration of the Spiritually dead. John
V. Roles within the Godhead
A. Jesus petitions the Father to send the Spirit Who then testifies of Jesus. John ; John
B. Father sends the Spirit in the name of Jesus. John
C. Jesus does the will of the Father : Mtt. ; John ; Heb.
D. All things under Jesus’ feet Who then is subject to the Father. 1 Cor. 15:28
E. As in marriage, the persons of the Trinity are equal, but differ in role.
VI.
Deity of Christ and the Holy
Spirit
Those who are unwilling to accept the doctrine of the Trinity must ignore the
following passages which overwhelmingly establish both Jesus and the Holy
Spirit as God.
A. Jesus called Jehovah : Ps. (cf. Heb. ); Jer. (cf. Isa. (cf. Ps. )
B. Jesus creator : John ; Eph.
C. Jesus does divine works : Mtt. (sends prophets); Mtt. (wooed Jerusalem); Mark ; John (cf. John )
D. Jesus equal with God : Num. (cf. Rev. ; John ; John ; Rev. )
E. Jesus eternal : Ps. ; Mic. ; John ; Rev.
F. Jesus fullness of God : Col.
G. Jesus omnipresent[7] : John
H. Jesus omniscient : John ; John
I. Jesus worshiped : Ex. ; Mtt. ; John ; Heb.
J. Jesus' titles as God : Ps. ; Jer. ; Acts (cf. Isa.
K. Jesus has authority to forgive sin[8] : Ex. Jesus; Mark Jesus
L. Holy Spirit - deity : Gen. (rejection unforgivable); Luke ; Acts (cf. 1Cor. (cf. 1Cor. (eternal); Heb. ; 1Jn.
M. Holy Spirit - a person : Holy Spirit - person : Ps. ; Eze. ; Acts ; 2Cor.
[1] Class notes are available from http://www.SpiritAndTruth.org/download/index.htmd for use within the free bible study software available from http://www.e-sword.net
[2] Walvoord, John, The Holy Spirit, p. 239.
[3] The
plural ending is usually described as a plural of majesty and not intended as a
true plural when used of God. This is seen in the fact that the noun <eáloµhéÆm
is consistently used with singular verb forms and with adjectives and pronouns
in the singular. Albright has suggested that the use of this majestic plural
comes from the tendency in the ancient near east toward a universalism: “We find in Canaanite an increasing tendency to employ the
plural sûtoroÆt
>startes<, and natoÆt >naths<, in the clear
sense of totality of manifestations of a deity’ ” (William F. Albright, From the Stone Age to Christianity, 2d
ed., p. 213). But a better reason can be seen in Scripture itself where, in the
very first chapter of Gen, the necessity of a term conveying both the unity of
the one God and yet allowing for a plurality of persons is found (Gen ). This is
further borne out by the fact that the form <eáloµhéÆm occurs only in Hebrew
and in no other Semitic language, not even in Biblical Aramaic (Gustav F.
Oehler, Theology of the Old Testament, p. 88). R. Laird
Harris, Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody Press, 1999,
c1980). "It is sometimes said that this one word [Elohim] had to be
used in both [singular and plural] contexts since there is no alternative in
Hebrew. This is not true however; the singular form of Elohim is Eloah and is
used in passages such as Deu. ." Fruchtenbaum,
Arnold, Messianic Christology, p.
103.
[4] Hunt, Dave, and T.A. McMahon, The Berean Call www.thebereancall.org February p. 2000.
[5] Regarding the authenticity of this verse, see : Holland, Thomas. Crowned With Glory
[6] The resurrection is attributed to the members of the Trinity as follows; Jesus: John ; ; Rom.
[7] "With the exception of Lutheran theologians, most interpreters regard Christ as omnipresent in His deity and local in His humanity." Walvoord, John F. Jesus Christ Our Lord. Chicago, IL: Moody Bible Institute, 1969, p. 28
[8] "We can all understand how a man forgives offences against himself. You tread on my toe and I forgive you, you steal my money and I forgive you. But what should we make of a man, himself unrobbed and untrodden on, who announced that he forgave you for treading on other men's toes and stealing other men's money? Asinine fatuity is the kindest description we should give of his conduct. Yet this is what Jesus did.... He unhesitatingly behaved as if He was the party chiefly concerned, the person chiefly offended in all offences. This makes sense only if He really was the God whose laws are broken and whose love is wounded in every sin." C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, 55-56.